tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4458490793617052985.post3983481749201085223..comments2021-10-11T04:18:46.301-05:00Comments on Well, Maybe Not: Buddhism reduxDanielle Gaitherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00619957904492931429noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4458490793617052985.post-26278570702937931072009-10-29T14:35:11.164-05:002009-10-29T14:35:11.164-05:00For the record, it's not like I was interrupti...For the record, it's not like I was interrupting someone's discourse on Spinoza with my problem. It was relevant to the topic at hand.<br /><br />Re: your remark on organized religion and human failings, my thoughts on that subject could fill an entire post, and they very well may in the near future.<br /><br />The group I've been visiting lately is actually affiliated with a major religion, but it takes a refreshing approach to said religion, and to religion in general. I'm not going to elaborate here, because my next full post will cover that.Danielle Gaitherhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00619957904492931429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4458490793617052985.post-10969274795579368522009-10-27T10:47:13.517-05:002009-10-27T10:47:13.517-05:00Well first of all, interesting acronym.
Second of ...Well first of all, interesting acronym.<br />Second of all, sounds like the problem is not with freethought groups, but freethought groups you have access to. They sound like one big meh party. Then again venting about personal issues at an intellectual discussion isn't always the best route either =/<br />Gasp! You mean the Big Trio's versions of organized religion aren't the only religions infected with human failings? :O<br />If you can find a non-religious meditation group where you can be part of a group where you're bound by a meaningful shared interest instead of merely "freethought" , go for it!Dillon Welchhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00264009338084889894noreply@blogger.com